“If this man doesn’t meditate”, I thought, “I’ll eat my hat”.
It was a randomly-caught radio programme – Music Matters on Radio 3 – which sparked thoughts of cerebellarophagy. It contained an item about the modern composer Helmut Lachenmann which I found so intriguing I saved it for posterity (please download and listen if you’re interested – at 11 minutes it’s a bandwidth hog).
The bit that particularly caught my ear was this, said by cellist Gabriella Swallow about the composer with whom she’s been working closely:
Every second counts with Lachenmann, I mean he’s always listening and I think this music is incredibly well heard. He even uses it as a demonstration – he tells you to stop talking… and he says ‘listen’. And you just listen for a minute and there’s a fan or a light or something, a little hum, and he says ‘that’s beautiful to me’. And it’s just this incredible sound world he engages you in.
This reminded me so strongly of the kind of meditation practice where you lose yourself in the universe of sound:
Listening meditation works in a different way from breath or sensation meditation. We do not focus inwardly but outwardly in a wide-open manner. We do not create nor imagine sounds. We wait for them to come to us. Any sounds will do — the roar of a car, the barking of a dog, the twittering of a bird. We listen attentively to any sounds that might occur with a non-grasping attitude. We open up to the music of the world and of life. We do not name, conjecture or identify the sounds. We just listen as widely and openly as we can at the sounds themselves. If there are no sounds we just listen to silence and its special hum. In listening meditation we cultivate an open and spacious attitude which waits quietly for the unknown without fears or expectations.
How could I miss what turned out to be the last concert in a series called Transcendent which was being held at the Queen Elizabeth Hall the very next night? Obviously I couldn’t.

That’s Lachenmann on the right having a pre-concert chat with journalist Tom Service, the host of the radio programme clip above. Nothing said in their exchange on stage lessened my sense that hearing this music would be in some way akin to listening meditation, and for me that was indeed the case – the sighs, whispers, hums, rattles, clinks, growls, squeaks, pops and twitters resembled the range of sounds which arise, mingle and fade away across the aural canvas of contemplation.
And of course it was also profoundly unlike a listening meditation because by its nature it was ordered, choreographed, wrought. And I couldn’t entirely lose myself in the sounds because the visual stimuli were so strong. The intense concentration on the faces of the musicians, the extraordinary things they did to their instruments to make the sound required by what must be an extraordinary score. What, to take one example among hundreds, is the notation for playing a clarinet by removing the mouthpiece and banging the top with the palm of your hand?
Thought followed on thought. Does Lachenmann explore the sonic possibilities of each instrument himself or in collaboration with individuals who can play them? Why is it important to make these sounds within (mostly) the constraints of the traditional instruments of the orchestra? I thought how different each experience of each performance or recording would be because of the sonic environment in which it is heard and whether that awareness was part of the intention of the composition.
At the end of the first piece there was a tingling in the air for many seconds of breath-held silence while the conductor remained motionless, semi-bowed, arms flung outwards, before he finally straightened and allowed the audience to applaud, amongst us the clearly delighted composer kissing his fingers to the musicians.
It was now or never.
As people dispersed slowly for the interval I bounded up the steps, planted myself as near to the lionised composer as I could get and asked, politely but firmly.
“Excuse me, do you meditate?”
Continue reading “Helmut Lachenmann”