Roses, sugar and pomegranates

“Are you happy with your choice?” he asked as I straightened up from taking a picture of the serried ranks of roses.

A country accent, bright blue eyes, collar length white hair thinning on top and shabby clothes. He had a petite and exquisitely turned-out woman clinging to his arm. Black high heels, flawless makeup, long black coat. His question seemed serious.

roses are red

“Well, I like the picture but I don’t like the roses” I replied, after a pause for thought.

“Why not?”

“Well, they look far too artificial. Too many petals crushed into too small a space. They look forced, as though they can’t breathe. They’re a bad shape. And the colour,” I added, warming to my theme, “there’s too much dark blue and purple in it. They look bruised. Battered. Attempting perfection and failing.

“I’m sorry…” suddenly catching a glance of the expression on the woman’s face, “these are just my opinions and I’m sure many people feel differently about them.”

“No, I’m interested”, he replied, folding, unfolding and refolding a small piece of paper in his hands, a receipt perhaps.

“But daddy!” the woman exclaimed in a voice which carried not the trace of an accent but betrayed her youth. I realised with a shock that she was in her very early teens.

“There are lots of other roses”, she said. “What about those?” She gestured to a bunch of buds in a sepulchral shade of near black.

“What do you think of them?” he asked.

“Too gloomy. They look like they’ve come off the set of a gothic film.”

His daughter had let go of his arm, presumably exasperated by the sudden complication of what I assumed was supposed to be the purchase of a valentine’s gift for her mother.

“What I’m worried about his how much they’re going to set me back” he said, rather grimly, as he again mechanically folded and unfolded the piece of paper.

“Well, this is Liberty, so whatever you buy will probably be the best of its kind”, I offered as the only consolation against excessive outlay I could think of.

“As well as the most expensive”, I thought as I shook his hand and left them examining the display, relieved he hadn’t asked me what I would choose.

sugar is sweet

Outside the tube station an altogether different approach to the rose trope. What would I choose here? The red-pawed cream bear holding a bunch of artificial roses? the rose-patterned-cellophane wrapped pink fluffy heart with “I love you” stitched in curlicues of scarlet? Or the string of flashing fairy lights twined with a creeper of blowsy rose-red plastic-petalled blooms?

As difficult a decision and no doubt involving products with a similar hefty mark-up albeit starting from a lower base price. Choices, choices.

Tomorrow, valentine’s day, I go to a mediation meeting to discuss the Solomonic topic of splitting the children. Not to mention the property. I’m perhaps not best placed to appreciate the current proliferation of roses, whatever form they take.

and so are you

What I would choose, if I were asked, would be a bunch of pomegranates. Ripe with symbolism I should choose to think of the story of Persephone and the revolving of the seasons.

But I shouldn’t think about it too hard because there’s all sorts of mother-daughter shit which would do my head in. And besides I would be too busy fiddling around trying to eat the damn things. Have you ever tried getting all those hundreds of seeds out?

PS Don’t forget to enter the Global Voices Valentine’s Day Poetry Contest! Even a cynical old saddo such as I might have a go, probably the very best antidote available for rose-overdose.

Rain in the 'burbs

I took the wide-angle lens out today as I went about my business. Which, when one has children, is everyone else’s business too. A parent approached the secondborn at the school gate this morning and after some discussion she was persuaded to ask him round to play with her son this afternoon. “I’ll call your mum” she said. “Oh you can’t call her now, she’s talking to her psychotherapist” he replied.

Sigh.

I went to see the film Bamako this evening – the gala premier no less!

green park bamako

I was actually within two feet of Danny Glover for about ten seconds and couldn’t think of anything to say to him.The film itself is very interesting – stunning, stunning visually and with some great music. It’s didactic too, strongly so. And it’s being marketed strongly by Christian Aid as an “end the debt and reform the IMF and WB” campaign tool including a petition.

Bits of it absolutely didn’t work for me. And other bits were breathtaking. The latter outweighed the former and it’s definitely worth seeing.

Rain in the ‘burbs

I took the wide-angle lens out today as I went about my business. Which, when one has children, is everyone else’s business too. A parent approached the secondborn at the school gate this morning and after some discussion she was persuaded to ask him round to play with her son this afternoon. “I’ll call your mum” she said. “Oh you can’t call her now, she’s talking to her psychotherapist” he replied.

Sigh.

I went to see the film Bamako this evening – the gala premier no less!

green park bamako

I was actually within two feet of Danny Glover for about ten seconds and couldn’t think of anything to say to him.The film itself is very interesting – stunning, stunning visually and with some great music. It’s didactic too, strongly so. And it’s being marketed strongly by Christian Aid as an “end the debt and reform the IMF and WB” campaign tool including a petition.

Bits of it absolutely didn’t work for me. And other bits were breathtaking. The latter outweighed the former and it’s definitely worth seeing.

Dewy youth, shrivelled age

dewy youth, shrivelled age

Guess which one I feel like.

This has been adjudged the runner-up for the picture of the day. The winner is redder. Which might have something to do with the colour preferences of the conscripted judge, who had also been out and about with a camera, but earlier than I by the look of things.

In case anyone has missed this story, it snowed today. A few centimeters. But enough to close the second-born’s school and cause something of a vital nature to “blow up” on the first-born’s morning train.

I don’t recall taking any pictures last time it snowed to any extent in London and unfortunately by the time I got out and about everything was mostly dripping rather than glittering. Still, better than a poke in the eye, as they say.

Rabbit rabbit

One of the pinnacles of my (brief) tenure as arts correspondent was covering an exhibition of knitting of which the highlight for me was “Domestic Interior” by Janet Morton. Despite the walrus-like harrumphing and spluttering of various (male) members of the newsroom the item was run at least once, as far as I can remember.

A delightful former colleague and fellow yarnivore has drawn my attention to the excellent Ming Yi Sung and her wonderful crochet which drew more than harrumphs from certain workers at the building it was being exhibited in. The video below tells the story of Public Art, Private Parts.

A certain amount of burrowing about on the internet reveals what has to be my favourite of her works so far:

White Rabbit

It puts a different spin (hook?) on Alice in Wonderland doesn’t it. I’d certainly dive down a rabbit-hole after that statuesque creature despite my history of lagophbia. I wonder what he’s got in that front-cottontail. Maybe I have a preference for bucks over does. I hadn’t thought of that before.

Frizzy bush

frizzy

Because it looks like my hair. It was damp, cold and damp today. Maybe that’s what gave it the kinks. (What did you think I was referring to? really?? No. I wasn’t.)
Although it’s not a tree, being as it is a bush, nevertheless it’s my excuse to draw attention (a few days late, sorry) to this month’s Festival of the Trees, hosted at Ginkgo Dreams.

Next month’s festival will be hosted by Riverside Rambles. Courtesy of Velveteen Rabbi I’ve learned that it was New Year of the Trees a couple of days ago, another reason to celebrate the laying down of rings. So get arboreal and send your entries to larry (dot) ayers (at) gmail (dot) com by February 27, or submit entries via the entry form at Blog Carnival.

Clear the smear

I wondered, vaguely, why recent photographs have had an unintentional soft-focus effect. Yesterday I actually thought to look at the lens of the camera and it was covered with a thin layer of something I can only assume was canine saliva. A great big slurpy deposit which took a considerable time to remove. Note to self – cameras and dogs shouldn’t be on the floor together. Oh, and put on the lens cap.

Thus armed with greater clarity we, boys and dog and camera, set out on a walk. Yesterday was all about sunshine. Beautiful, glorious, peachy, slanting winter sunlight striking from an open blue sky throwing long shadows.

At last a world of subtle gradations and stark contrasts after weeks and months of deepest dullest stultifying flattening uniformity of grey. The camera gambolled like a spring lamb, despite the lack of legs and fluffy tail.

More light and less slobber. A heart-lifting combination.

I’ve found God AND mortality

Not bad for a weekday lunchtime.

mortal(ity) and God

On the left there we have Ivy Alvarez with mortal, on the right we have Natalie d’Arbeloff (in the guise of her alter ego Augustine) with The God Interviews. Both have very recently been delivered, after long labour, of a book. As you can see.
I shall endeavour to review both when I’ve read them in their entirety. So far I can say I thoroughly recommend both babies books.

Also I can say that I find it puzzling that the name Natalie d’Arbeloff isn’t as famous as that of Maira Kalman. The latter is a wonderful artist who’s clever with words. So is the former. The latter has book deals and a blog with monthly posts which is syndicated by the New York Times. The former, utterly mysteriously, does not.

Unfortunately the NYT has hidden Ms Kalman behind a subscription, but a couple of her posts can be viewed here. And here’s a picture from her December post which I rather liked.

Bach dress

Anyway. The point of this digression is to suggest that anyone who wishes to support an artist and writer of true talent, grit and determination can easily do so by offering her a lucrative book deal for the follow-up which is already in the pipeline. Or failing that (if you don’t happen to be a publisher) buy the first instalment!

I've found God AND mortality

Not bad for a weekday lunchtime.

mortal(ity) and God

On the left there we have Ivy Alvarez with mortal, on the right we have Natalie d’Arbeloff (in the guise of her alter ego Augustine) with The God Interviews. Both have very recently been delivered, after long labour, of a book. As you can see.
I shall endeavour to review both when I’ve read them in their entirety. So far I can say I thoroughly recommend both babies books.

Also I can say that I find it puzzling that the name Natalie d’Arbeloff isn’t as famous as that of Maira Kalman. The latter is a wonderful artist who’s clever with words. So is the former. The latter has book deals and a blog with monthly posts which is syndicated by the New York Times. The former, utterly mysteriously, does not.

Unfortunately the NYT has hidden Ms Kalman behind a subscription, but a couple of her posts can be viewed here. And here’s a picture from her December post which I rather liked.

Bach dress

Anyway. The point of this digression is to suggest that anyone who wishes to support an artist and writer of true talent, grit and determination can easily do so by offering her a lucrative book deal for the follow-up which is already in the pipeline. Or failing that (if you don’t happen to be a publisher) buy the first instalment!

Frayed

frayed

Possibly even threadbare. But hanging on and admiring the view.

Now if I were a proper photographer I would know how to make the detail sharper, the range of tones greater etc etc. Might be something to do with compensating for a back-lit exposure I suppose. So much to learn!