links for 2007-11-26

Painting with light

This morning the early sun tipped over the rooftops and shone the yellow leaves of a small silver birch to a fountain of firework brightness.

This afternoon a lightbrush washed leisurely lines behind the trees.

skypaint

Round the corner we marvelled at a sky full of fiery scarlet scales. By the time we reached home a few minutes later they were gone.

links for 2007-11-25

Dumplings for lunch

consultation

Such a give-away. The recipe book, the phone and the notes, all together as above on the side in the kitchen. It was obvious that our hostess had been consulting her mother.

awaiting immersion

A regional speciality, apparently, from her home area of Germany. A form of meat-stuffed dumplings – minced liver sausage and some other form/s of meat not vouchsafed to us – enfolded and rolled inside a potato-based dumpling shell. There they are awaiting immersion in the boiling water.

dressed to the nines

Once cooked they were covered in, what else, a meat sauce. Served, I assume possibly as a concession to the faddy Brits concerned about a balanced diet, with puréed apple.

Our hostess assured us, full of woe, that they were really nothing like as good as her mother’s. No, it wasn’t different ingredients, they were all from Germany. No, it wasn’t a different recipe or procedure since, as we had already detected, she’d double checked with the mother in question who had provided precise instructions.

Or maybe not entirely precise. “How thick should the layer of dumpling dough be?” our anxious chef had apparently asked. “Well, not too thick and not to thin” came the unarguable but unhelpful reply.

I love this shared unbroken chain of culinary self-defined failure spreading back, no doubt, daughter to mother, nigh unto the advent of fire.

They were, of course, absolutely delicious. But I needed a long period of motionlessness in a horizontal position afterwards.

Hypnotic earworm

by the sea - blue

Why would this image have anything to do with an earworm?

It was the teacher’s suggestion to use blue ink to make the print. Inspired. Now the water and foam look both like water and foam and also sky and cloud. And the moon floats serenely in both.

(Let me link yet again to the absolutely brilliant poem the image was originally created to go alongside.)

Sky and clouds feature as a metaphor for conveying how we might still our minds during meditation:

The mind is like space or like sky, completely clear, not solid, and vast, spacious and unlimited.

Try to get a sense of how your mind is like that, like this clear, vast, spacious sky.

The things that we are aware of, the thoughts, images, memories and so on, are similar to the clouds that pass through the sky.

They’re not always there but they appear and after a while they disappear.

If there are thoughts appearing in your mind while you are sitting here doing this meditation, thoughts, memories, images, or if you hear sounds or feel sensations in your body, think that these are just like clouds, passing through this space or clear sky of your mind.

Let them come and let them go, realise that they are only momentary and not solid, they just come and go.

Let them go and return your awareness to the mind itself, which is like the clear spacious sky.

“You can be above your thoughts and watch them as though they were clouds below you in the sky” said my teacher.

I have a huge problem with this, though. Absolutely massive.

The problem is that the first time I was introduced to this way of conceptualising the activity (or lack of activity) someone in the group, who shall remain nameless but never forgotten, started singing Both Sides Now by Joni Mitchel:

I’ve looked at clouds from both sides now
From up and down, and still somehow
It’s cloud illusions I recall
I really don’t know clouds at all.

And every single time, yes, every. single. time. I meditate in this way I have to listen to Joni and her little ditty.

This has been amusing. Also infuriating. Boring. Enraging. Irritating like a shirt label rubbing the sensitive skin on the back of your back. Painful as an ill-fitting shoe rubbing a raw patch of skin. Frustratingly circularly self-referential as a small dog chasing its docked tail.

No doubt this is highly revealing in some way about the crapness of my mind but don’t ask me how. Nowadays I just let her twitter on, secure in the knowledge that there’s nothing I can do about it and trying to makes it worse. Maybe one day it won’t happen… and I’ll notice. And then maybe, one day, it won’t happen… and I won’t notice!

After producing a permanent pictorial reminder of a meditation closed-loop I trundled down to the IoP to take part in Dr Bell‘s research into the neuropsychology of suggestion and dissociative disorders, which was remarkably similar to the Joni effect.

I used to believe myself highly susceptible to hypnosis since a friend at university, who’d done a day’s course, managed to make me offer the assembled company hot chocolate in midsummer as a result of post-hypnotic suggestion. Of course I only have everyone else’s word for it that I was acting in a pre-programmed way since I remember nothing other than making the offer and everyone falling about laughing.

This time it was different. Although I believe I was probably hypnotised because I couldn’t, for instance, bend my arm when told it was stiff there was part of my brain which was observing everything as though from a distance. Looking at clouds from both sides now, as it were. So while I couldn’t bend my arm when told it was as stiff as a bar of iron there was part of my brain saying “hmmm, interesting. You’re trying really hard to bend your arm, genuinely trying, but you can’t. However you know that you haven’t lost the ability to move. You could do it. But you won’t because you’ve been told you can’t. Hmmm. Interesting.”

Most interesting was the post-hypnotic suggestion. I remember being told that I was going to forget everything I had been asked to do while hypnotised and then remember everything when I prompted by a certain set of words. I think I was told that I was also going to forget what I had been told. But the cloud-watching part of the brain was busy telling me that this was obviously the post-hypnotic suggestion part of the plan and was keeping tabs on what was going on.

When we were “woken up” we were asked to write down on a piece of paper what we had been doing while hypnotised. I knew that I’d been told I wouldn’t be able to remember, I also knew that I almost certainly could, but – and here’s the interesting bit (for those of you who might not find this blow-by-blow account entirely riveting) – I couldn’t activate the part of my brain necessary to recover the memory in order to write it down. In the end I had to write “I was told I wouldn’t be able to remember but I can’t remember whether I was told I wouldn’t be able to remember that or not”.

Doncha just love the human brain?

I fear my failure to be deeply hypnotised will rule me out of further opportunities to take part in the research and, most important of all to me, have a brain scan image all of my very own to play with. Rats.

So now I’m wondering what effect, if any, practising meditation has on ones suggestibility for hypnosis and whether this particular sort of dissociative activity (“mind observing mind”, unlike the pathological dissociation experienced by people with PTSD and, let it be said, certain forms of depression) is useful or otherwise.

Rhetorical wonderings, of course. But I’m glad I went and I’m glad I have the print which so serendipitously reminds me of the experience.

My child the sub-chicken creature

I have just discovered that secondspawn has access to less outdoor space than a free range chicken. And despite being of slightly less than average stature his is considerably bigger than any form of poultry. (Unless an ostrich counts as poultry, but even if it is I am going to ignore it for the purposes of my argument.)

I always knew that the school – huge, built in a different era – had a seriously inadequate outdoor space. Now it transpires that not only is there not a single blade of grass but also there is a ratio of a mere 1m² of bald featureless tarmac per pupil. The playground is so small that the school can’t have playtime together so the classes operate what is called “timetabled play” where different years use the space at different times.

Contrast this with the UK Government standards for free range poultry:

In addition, the birds have had during at least half their lifetime continuous daytime access to open-air runs, comprising an area mainly covered by vegetation, of not less than:

* 1m² per chicken or guinea fowl (in the case of guinea fowls, open-air runs may be replaced by a perchery having a floor space of at least that of the house and a height of at least 2m, with perches of at least 10 cm length available per bird in total (house and perchery)).
* 2m² per duck
* 4m² per turkey or goose

Apparently the school playground provides less than half the area of the current government guidelines on minimum outdoor space for children, although I can’t find those guidelines to link to.

I know all this because I’ve been helping a dynamic (and gorgeous) friend finesse our children’s school’s entry in a dream playground competition.

It’s a huge school, it’s an inner-city school, it’s a poor school and a very high proportion of the pupils is made up of refugees living in temporary accommodation.

Winning the competition wouldn’t make the playground bigger but it could make it far, far more stimulating and better-used. I really think the children deserve to win.

I also really think it is the job of the government to ensure that the schools it provides conform to its own minimum standards rather than relying on the charity of “lady bountiful” banks. But that’s another story.

The v1rgin/wh0re complex

Or, to put it another way, the glam0ur model / research scientist simplistic:

Quick links from the past week in mind and brain news:

Glam0ur model Daisy Thompson-Lake has a forthcoming paper on synaesthesia in the British Journal of Psychology.

I’m not going to parse this other than to say it appeared on a site serious about science.

For men: what’s the type of your v1rgin wh0re Complex? Whatever combination of answers you put in there appears to be only one outcome.

For women: the v1rgin-wh0re dichotomy test. For this there are, well, three results.

The peculiar spelling is to prevent a possible rash of ill-fitting google ads.

I’m grumpy today.

Another exciting use of flickr by a UK museum

First we had (or at least the first I knew about) Tate Britain setting up a flickr group alongside its exhibition How We Are which invited participation and gave prizes. Now we have the V&A Museum setting up a dedicated flickr group and encouraging virtual and offline interaction. Shiny!

Here are the terms of engagement:

Post your photos of the V&A Museum, its galleries, collections, events taking place within the V&A and photos of your visit.

We are happy for you to take photographs in the galleries, including flash photography, but photography is not permitted in special exhibitions or where an object’s label indicates a private loan. We cannot include images of these items in this group and they will be removed.

Including flash!! Good grief.

It’s more than just a gesture towards online social network development (although I’m sure its existence ticks all sorts of management objective boxes). The group page makes made good use of flickr group bling (displays of most interesting photos, stats etc) which give the group page eye- and brain- appeal, and it’s linking to (some) other London museum flickr groups only one of which appears also to be an “official” group set up by the organisation in question.

To encourage online activity the group has initiated monthly challenges. It’s interesting to see how the range and number of submissions has increased from the first in October on the theme of gardens to this month’s on the theme of light.

Even more interestingly on the group’s front page there’s a link to the museum’s upcoming Friday Late event on Crafting Couture. Those pages in turn encourage participants to share their photos on the flickr group with a prominently placed link. Firstly this changing specificity on the group front page indicates, together with the monthly challenges, that there’s going to be a continuity of care devoted by the organisation to the group. Secondly it’s an interesting and effective way to drive digital traffic to foot traffic and vice versa.

I found out about the group’s existence after a polite comment on one of my pictures tagged V&A suggested I might like to join. After I did so I got an equally polite message thanking me for doing so. Both are no doubt automated and part of an awareness-raising campaign but that in itself implies to me a good grasp of the technological side of things. The moderators’ entries and responses on the discussion boards are interesting and timely. It looks like there’s serious thought, resources and effort going into this project.

Yes. I like this. I like this very much. I shall watch with interest as it grows and develops.